Arnau Bach for The New York Times
Ketevan Sidamonidze of Georgia
chose to study at the Esade business school in Barcelona because of its
focus on socially responsible business practices.
By CHRISTOPHER F. SCHUETZE
Like many businesspeople, Ketevan Sidamonidze has traveled far — in her case from Georgia, in the Caucasus region, to the Esade business school in Spain — to earn a master’s in business administration. Unlike most others, she said, the driving force in her decision to get an M.B.A. was not to improve her career prospects, but rather to improve her ability do social good.
“I came to Esade because of the way they were advertising their social
aspect,” said Ms. Sidamonidze, who is just finishing a degree program
that she started in August 2012. “It really stood out.”
At Esade, social entrepreneurship is part of the curriculum, both in the
classroom and outside: As an extracurricular activity, Ms. Sidamonidze
is part of a team helping to set up a business plan for an organization
that brings specialized housing to the elderly.
Teaching effective management remains the core function of business
schools. But since the near-collapse of the global economy, teaching
business as usual has lost some of its luster.
Particularly in Europe, which suffered much of the fallout, revelations
of reckless management in the financial industry — a main employer of
business school graduates — and the devastating consequences for
taxpayers and working people have led to something of a backlash.
Students and employers have started to demand that business educators
pay more attention to long-term social and ethical sustainability.
In responding to this, business schools are following, not leading, the trend.
Pamela Hartigan, director of the Skoll Center for Social Entrepreneurship at Oxford University’s
Said Business School, said that much of what was being taught in the
field of social entrepreneurship — market-driven business with a social
end — was at the behest of students.
“We are putting down the tracks as the train is coming,” she said.
The increased emphasis on teaching sustainable or more socially
responsible business practices is driven by larger cultural changes, not
the schools themselves, said Daniela Papi, who worked for
nongovernmental organizations in Cambodia for six years before heading
to the Skoll center to join a master’s program last year. She is now a
consultant for the center.
“M.B.A.s are changing; they will have to, to survive,” she said.
Experts say that students interested in social business remain a
minority of M.B.A. applicants, reflecting both the typically high cost
of tuition and the fact that universities often offer management
programs more suited to the nonprofit sector outside their M.B.A.
programs.
Still, Professor Hartigan estimated that half the M.B.A. students at the Said school were interested in the subject.
The Skoll center has made a point of focusing on teaching and
researching social business models. At other schools the percentage is
lower, but it is nonetheless significant.
Net Impact, a sustainable-business networking group, carried out a study
of business students last year that found that 39 percent of
respondents would consider working in social enterprises and that about
34 percent were considering the nonprofit sector — figures that may have
reflected the depressed state of the graduate jobs market.
While training managers for social business and nonprofits is important,
so too is educating traditional business managers in issues like
corporate social responsibility, advocates of sustainable-business
education say.
“If students go on to work at McKinsey or Shell, that is not necessarily
a bad thing,” Ms. Papi said, noting that socially responsible business
training was also needed at large corporate entities.
The Copenhagen Business School, the largest in Scandinavia, has a strong
reputation for its social and sustainable business courses, at least in
part a reflection of the character of Danish society, according to
Daniel Hjorth, a professor at the school.
“We insist that the social is not an epi-phenomenon in the economy,” he
said, noting that the provision of social benefits in Scandinavian
countries was not seen as merely a secondary effect of market-driven
activity.
No comments:
Post a Comment